- 2024年9月25日
- 讀畢需時 2 分鐘
When I first look at Danh Vo’s interview, I was confused by its topic: Art Should Estrange. This is the first time I heard somebody define art in such way. When you first see his artworks and received the information that he was a Vietnam War Refugees, you will soon connect them together, stating that these were his personal work. Yet he refused to admit. He described his work as a “consequence” of those social issue.
One of a good example will be his iconic work Oma Totem(2009). It is a sculpture created with objects provided by his refugees grandmother when she first arrived to Germany. When his family were escaping from the war, they have separate into two boats. It led to a end that part of his family members went to Germany. But he treated it in a very objective way — he described it as a record of a gap or a miscommunication created by the war, which was a reasonable and good practice on displaying memories — using own experience to record social phenomena and collective memories. It is way more powerful than just presenting datas, but at the same time keep the attitude to be objective.

Danh Vo - Oma Totem(2009)
However, the way he reconstruct memory is the most impressing part on his practice. If you understand his practice, you will know that his is actually questioning it:
“I was interested in the distance between different social groups,…I wanted to deal with estrangement, when you would come in a white cube where information is amputated. That you would just not understand.”
Without any explanation, you will definitely not understand his work, and this was his intention as he was tearing up communication itself. Though he was doing a kind of documentation ,he was isolating the audience to the real world, refusing any kinds of social norms affecting audiences’ view, bringing things goes to the level of abstraction. “Everyone is Born in systems,”he said, “We were taught to be harmonist, but contradiction exists everywhere.”Thus, his work is a learning process to embrace and coexist with contradictions. He described that the desire we owned was given by others, by the society. When we set problems to trap ourselves into the problems, that will be the first time we can taste what is to be freedom. He mentioned that the western countries uphold freedom, but they keep having wars. The fact is thought provoking, which makes me understand what he tires to challenge and amazed by how he reconstruct memories and enhanced it into the another level.
“Art is not bridging. Art is estranged.” Though I hate things to be abstract in my own art practice, his practice groundbreaking, thought-provocative, and truly respectable.